We love to hear your feedback. Your suggestions and ideas are important to us. Our feedback forum is a great place to post your ideas and vote on others. Please share your detailed use case and how the proposed enhancements can increase value to your business. We do read all of your posts, but may not be able to respond to all comments.
More information on the status of submitted ideas can be found here
Restrict data to team that the person has access to
Filter selections are not in line with Organisational Hierarchy i.e. Department is the second tier in Organisational Hierarchy - no access to top level
Location is our Applicant job search criteria - pretty much useless for a Manager
Recommend mouseover text for items like "Roles to fill", Jobs, Applicants, candidates etc
|
What is the business process you are trying to achieve?
I like the new Benchmarking tool but in its current form it is pretty hobbled I want a User to be able to drill down to specific areas of interest and also restrict to User permissions (e.g. Team access) |
Hi Adam - Recruitment Team - looking forward to this - once we have this then users with access to more than one team can drill down. Would the Team list be restricted to the Teams a person is linked to?
I will follow up the data restrictions from guidance provided - I will have to review this to see if we want control over the data we provide access to - we currently apply no restriction in reports but might want to in the future.
Org Hierarchy - Brand being added in next week - thanks - do we have language overrides?
Brand should be "Business" from what we call it in our Instance on the job card
Department is "Unit" from what we call it in our Instance on the job card
Location - it is our applicant job search criteria - not much use to our Managers - is this something we can turn off in our instance? The Teams filter is probably all we need - we are in the process of adding Site but are not there yet.
Can we adjust the order of the filter items? e.g. move Recruitment Process down towards the bottom
Ideally even have the ability to hide filter items in permissions for Users or in our Instance
Mouseover text - like Flag mouseover - ability to provide an explanation without having to go off to KP. e.g. what does applicants vs candidates mean/ Jobs vs Roles (roles = total number of positions in the job card) . From KP (Applicants: The people who submit application(s) within the time frame. Candidates: Applicants who have gone through at least 1 application step. basically - someone who has been moved from New status
I have a lot of users and showing them KP will freak them out
Is this data filtered to the Full job card only - the one we use for Advertising?? We use a lot (75%) of Simple job cards with very few applicants (if any) on them.
I see they can even schedule the data to be sent. This could get interesting but at least benchmarking funnel is pretty restricted in what you can set up (I have seen some crazy reports) we should be fine.
Hi Mark,
In regards to
Data Restrictions
jobs should be filtered using the same logic as the rest of enhanced reporting: https://knowledgeportal.pageuppeople.com/hc/en-gb/articles/17126170983449-ER-Permissions
Additionally, for those with expanded access, we will add the recruitment team of the jobs as an available filter
Filter selections are not in line with Organisational Hierarchy
The top level (usually Brand) will be added as a filter option within the next week
Location is our Applicant job search criteria
Understand that the location set against the job does not have a use case for your organisation. Are you able to provide what location use case
Recommend mouseover text for items
Can you please expand what you mean by this? Is this about providing more information on what these terms mean, without having to reference the knowledge portal article (https://knowledgeportal.pageuppeople.com/hc/en-gb/articles/19642898590489-Recruitment-Benchmarking-Funnel)?
Are there any further areas for improvement that are impeding usage of this funnel?
Kind regards,