Community Feedback

We love to hear your feedback. Your suggestions and ideas are important to us. Our feedback forum is a great place to post your ideas and vote on others. Please share your detailed use case and how the proposed enhancements can increase value to your business. We do read all of your posts, but may not be able to respond to all comments.

More information on the status of submitted ideas can be found here

ADD A NEW IDEA

Recruitment

Showing 1514

Flag enhancements

Flag enhancements
Guest over 4 years ago in Recruitment 2 Future consideration

Remove Stars & Numbers from performance rating final page

Remove Stars & Numbers from performance rating final page
Guest over 4 years ago in Recruitment 1 Low Community Interest

Talent Pool - Category auto remove upon withdrawal

Where a applicant withdraws from a job in a Talent Pool, their Talen Pool categories will be auto removed. Currently this is a manual process :(
Mark Teague over 2 years ago in Recruitment 2 New idea

Talent search - Default - Hide/cascade search fields

A) The ability to amend the default 'Active' checkbox on the Talent Search (currently it is set to "All" whereas "Active" would be more logical for a default search.B) The ability to hide search fields below the 'Talent pools' until an initial sea...
Mark Teague over 2 years ago in Recruitment 0 New idea

Make the Approval Position text field bigger

Enlarge the "Approval Position" and "Job Position" field sizes. These position titles tend to be much longer than the default user names and we find we often have to scroll through the approval position text field to read its contents. There seems...
Guest about 1 year ago in Recruitment 1 Not currently aligned

Option to only send a "Delay Email" on a weekday

Our "Delay Email" option is set to 1-2 days for some of our correspondence to candidates. Sometimes our recruiters forget to change this and emails get sent out on weekends to candidates, which doesn't look good. In parallel to us educating our re...
Lauren Farr over 1 year ago in Recruitment 1 Future consideration

Application Submitted with populated lProviderID from Job Card

The system should tie the user who moved the application to the position. When someone looks at a record and they see their name as HR that they moved the application this causes confusion.
Barb Rardin about 1 year ago in Recruitment 0 Future consideration

Please update Public filename to include {APPLICANTPREFNAME}

Currently, only {APPLICANTFNAME} merge field is available for Document public filenames. Would like to continue consistent application of preferred names throughout PageUp.
Samson Blackwell 10 months ago in Recruitment 0 Future consideration

Improve the false detection of duplicated profiles

False detection of duplicated profiles occurs. When users click View duplicates, there is no profiles for merge. Support team said this is due to applicant renamed or no longer exists (ticket #53653). But we don't expect system to check duplicates...
Vicky Chung 5 months ago in Recruitment 1 Future consideration

Update Advertising Sources

We've recently udpated our application sources to reflect updated advertising lists. However, I noticed that we were unable to have people list something under the category of "other". For example, we post all ads to our subscription sites. We als...
Brandy Bloom about 4 years ago in Recruitment 2 Future consideration