Skip to Main Content
Community Feedback

We love to hear your feedback. Your suggestions and ideas are important to us. Our feedback forum is a great place to post your ideas and vote on others. Please share your detailed use case and how the proposed enhancements can increase value to your business. We do read all of your posts, but may not be able to respond to all comments.

More information on the status of submitted ideas can be
found here

Status Future consideration
Categories Recruitment
Created by Cristina Figueroa de Enriquez
Created on Apr 27, 2021

Display the user updating the Offer Status instead of the recruiter under the applicant's history

Track the name of the user initiating the offer and updating the offer status or leave blank if the update is generated by the system, as the system does with other updates.

What business value are you trying to achieve?

Currently, if someone other that the recruiter (IProvider) updates the Offer Status for a candidate, the IProvider name will still be linked to the offer status update tracked in the applicant's history. This is confusing as it appears that the lProvider completed the action and is not telling of the person who actually did.

  • Attach files
  • Cristina Figueroa de Enriquez
    Reply
    |
    Mar 1, 2022

    Agree that displaying the lProvider name, under the applicant history, and not the name of the user who actually initiated the offer for an applicant is confusing. In addition, updating the same Offer Status line to track the current status of the offer is confusing since the date/time stamp and lProvider name remain the same. Since it is the history tab, it would be ideal to see a line of history for each of those offer status updates (offer made, offer accepted, etc), the date/time when each took place, and the user who initiated those actions.

  • Kimberly Adams
    Reply
    |
    Jul 12, 2021

    Agreed this should display the user updating the offer status. This is confusing and could present audit issues as it appears the job owner (in our case recruiter) performed an action that they didn't perform.