We love to hear your feedback. Your suggestions and ideas are important to us. Our feedback forum is a great place to post your ideas and vote on others. Please share your detailed use case and how the proposed enhancements can increase value to your business. We do read all of your posts, but may not be able to respond to all comments.
More information on the status of submitted ideas can be found here
Thank you for looking into this.
From the description below, are you saying currently the action of check the checkbox and highlighting the sourcing channel are trigger both by clicking on the sourcing channel and only the # of click is being used to differentiate?
I understand the concern of accidentally open up sourcing channel to be edited. Is it possible to differentiate the two actions? Click on checkbox is to identify a sourcing channel to be used for sourcing, it should automatically open the sourcing channel page to be edited. Clicking on the name of the sourcing channel only allows for review of the sourcing channel page?
Xiaodong
Hi, the highlighted area is the one that you are currently editing.
The checkbox is whether each source is set to be sourced or not
can I confirm that your suggestion is that if they open a sourcing channel, it should automatically be marked as active and ready to source?
Currently it does not work like this as it raises the risk that inadvertent channels could be sourced just by looking at that channel, but UX improvements could definitely be made to make it clearer whether a sourcing channel is active or not.