We love to hear your feedback. Your suggestions and ideas are important to us. Our feedback forum is a great place to post your ideas and vote on others. Please share your detailed use case and how the proposed enhancements can increase value to your business. We do read all of your posts, but may not be able to respond to all comments.
More information on the status of submitted ideas can be found here
The history should reflect a true audit of what occurred. If a rule moves a candidate to a status the history should display "moved by rule". All candidate status changes should reflect the name of the actual user who moved the candidate for audit purposes.
|
What business value are you trying to achieve?
The name of the actual person/process who moved the candidate into a status should appear instead of the hiring manager. When candidates are automatically moved into a status (i.e. not qualified) based on a rule, the hiring manager's name appears in history as if they moved them to that status. We would like to see "moved by rule" in history as this gives us false audit data. Our hiring managers are concerned as they did not physically move the candidate or even login to PageUp, yet their name appears in history as having moved the candidate. |
same thought! those actions were not done by that hiring manager / recruiter!
also it is strange to use CURRENT hiring manager / recruiter's name in some history items. how come the current recruiter's name is in an action that happened 2 years ago when the recruiter actually joined lately... every newly joined recruiter asks the same question "Why is my name in history at the time before I join?"... PageUp brings me loads of embarrassing moments explaining why something simple cannot be done